Previous Entry | Next Entry

[random] white room
Previous posts:
Act I, Scene 1: The Crazy Occult Forays of Marcellus and Horatio.
Act I, Scene 2: Claudius is the villain, but he's still hotter than you.




Enter LAERTES and OPHELIA
LAERTES
My necessaries are embark'd: farewell:
And, sister, as the winds give benefit
And convoy is assistant, do not sleep,
But let me hear from you.

OPHELIA
Do you doubt that?

LAERTES
For Hamlet and the trifling of his favour,
Hold it a fashion and a toy in blood,
A violet in the youth of primy nature,
Forward, not permanent, sweet, not lasting,
The perfume and suppliance of a minute; No more.


Ophelia is...rather important to me. I doubt she would be, naturally speaking, if I hadn't decided years ago that no one understood her but me and thus adopted her as my own personal cause celebre, but I did, and I have, and there it is.

I put a lot of stock in the first appearances and first lines of major characters. By that token, I will point out that Ophelia's first line is a question that her brother doesn't answer. He seems not even to hear it.

"A violet in the youth of primy nature": I wrote a paper when I was in school on the uses of violets in Hamlet. Wish I knew where it was now. Laertes uses violets here as a metaphor for intense, passionate, dangerous feelings that don't last. Compare that to Ophelia's later line, when she's mad: "I would give you violets, but they withered all when my father died." Is she saying that her love for Hamlet died when he murdered her father? There are a number of things that I wish Shakespeare had written, just to see what they would look like after being translated through his brain. A play about Elizabeth I, for instance. I wish Hamlet had seen Ophelia mad, because once she goes mad everyone listens to her. More about that later.

OPHELIA
No more but so?

LAERTES
Think it no more;


"Don't trust your own judgment. Do what your brother says. By the way, here's a pamphlet for a nice convent."

For nature, crescent, does not grow alone

That would be the first of a number of very awkward penis metaphors that Ophelia will have to endure from both Laertes and Polonius as this scene continues. Christ, give a girl a complex, why don't you.

Perhaps he loves you now,
And now no soil nor cautel doth besmirch
The virtue of his will: but you must fear,
His greatness weigh'd, his will is not his own;
For he himself is subject to his birth:
He may not, as unvalued persons do,
Carve for himself; for on his choice depends
The safety and health of this whole state;
And therefore must his choice be circumscribed
Unto the voice and yielding of that body
Whereof he is the head.


"Face it, sis: you're cute, but you're not exactly queen material." This seems reasonable to me---considering who her father is, very little material advantage would return to the throne of Denmark from a union between Hamlet and Ophelia. I shouldn't think it would be allowed either. And yet, at Ophelia's funeral, Gertrude plainly says that she expected Ophelia and Hamlet to marry. Is she just letting her romantic sensibilities run away with her, or did Claudius think perhaps that Ophelia was a nice, safe person for Hamlet to marry, in that all her relatives were already under his thumb and not likely to make any trouble for Denmark as the family of a foreign princess might?

Anyway, I don't care that he's making sense, it is still icky that Laertes is having this conversation with his sister. ICKY.

Then if he says he loves you,
It fits your wisdom so far to believe it
As he in his particular act and place
May give his saying deed; which is no further
Than the main voice of Denmark goes withal.
Then weigh what loss your honour may sustain,
If with too credent ear you list his songs,
Or lose your heart, or your chaste treasure open
To his unmaster'd importunity.


I go back and forth wondering whether Ophelia actually did have sex with Hamlet. I think there's evidence both ways. More to the point, however, I don't think it MATTERS. A girl in her position is made by what other people chose to think about her, and anything she does can be interpreted either innocently or lewdly, depending on the agenda of the people around her. I think Ophelia is probably a very young teenager, 15-16 or thereabouts, because the evidence would suggest that she's grown up in the royal court, but she hasn't yet acquired the guile of an experienced courtier. Unfortunately, the only people around her to correct that are Polonius and Laertes, and she's light-years smarter than either of them.

Fear it, Ophelia, fear it, my dear sister,
And keep you in the rear of your affection,
Out of the shot and danger of desire.
The chariest maid is prodigal enough,
If she unmask her beauty to the moon:
Virtue itself 'scapes not calumnious strokes:
The canker galls the infants of the spring,
Too oft before their buttons be disclosed,
And in the morn and liquid dew of youth
Contagious blastments are most imminent.


"Basically, and I'm not about to fix this because you're my sister and EW, but you probably don't quite get how sex works, so just take my advice and run whenever you see Hamlet coming. EW, SISTER, DOUBLE ENTENDRE, SQUICK."

Be wary then; best safety lies in fear:
Youth to itself rebels, though none else near.


That just sums up everything Ophelia's family thinks of her in a trice, doesn't it? She's a child and they don't want her to grow up or develop the ability to judge for herself. Why should she need to? They'll always be around to look after her. Unless, you know, Laertes is about to fuck off to France, and Polonius is about to get his ass killed or something.

OPHELIA
I shall the effect of this good lesson keep,
As watchman to my heart. But, good my brother,
Do not, as some ungracious pastors do,
Show me the steep and thorny way to heaven;
Whiles, like a puff'd and reckless libertine,
Himself the primrose path of dalliance treads,
And recks not his own rede.


I told you Ophelia was smarter than the rest of her family. She's a little bit clever; she has a gentle, teasing wit that she probably doesn't dare give much reign to because Polonius would have no use for a mouthy daughter. I used to wonder, just a bit, what drew Hamlet to her, and that may be it---a spark of something special in her that in time might have grown into something less fragile and more enduring.

LORD POLONIUS
Yet here, Laertes! aboard, aboard, for shame!
The wind sits in the shoulder of your sail,
And you are stay'd for. There; my blessing with thee!
And these few precepts in thy memory
See thou character. Give thy thoughts no tongue,
Nor any unproportioned thought his act.
Be thou familiar, but by no means vulgar.
Those friends thou hast, and their adoption tried,
Grapple them to thy soul with hoops of steel;
But do not dull thy palm with entertainment
Of each new-hatch'd, unfledged comrade. Beware
Of entrance to a quarrel, but being in,
Bear't that the opposed may beware of thee.
Give every man thy ear, but few thy voice;
Take each man's censure, but reserve thy judgment.
Costly thy habit as thy purse can buy,
But not express'd in fancy; rich, not gaudy;
For the apparel oft proclaims the man,
And they in France of the best rank and station
Are of a most select and generous chief in that.
Neither a borrower nor a lender be;
For loan oft loses both itself and friend,
And borrowing dulls the edge of husbandry.
This above all: to thine ownself be true,
And it must follow, as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false to any man.
Farewell: my blessing season this in thee!


You know, Polonius is undeniably an idiot, but I have always found that passage rather moving. It's chock full of common sense, and a kid traveling into a foreign country could do worse for advice. On the other hand, Polonius has probably made this speech to Laertes several times already.

LAERTES
Farewell, Ophelia; and remember well
What I have said to you.

OPHELIA
'Tis in my memory lock'd,
And you yourself shall keep the key of it.


"I am using this key metaphor so that neither one of us will have to examine your 'chaste treasure' line too closely."

LORD POLONIUS
What is't, Ophelia, be hath said to you?


"There will be no privacy in this house, young lady. Only whores need privacy."

OPHELIA
So please you, something touching the Lord Hamlet.

LORD POLONIUS
Marry, well bethought:
'Tis told me, he hath very oft of late
Given private time to you; and you yourself
Have of your audience been most free and bounteous:
If it be so, as so 'tis put on me,
And that in way of caution, I must tell you,
You do not understand yourself so clearly
As it behoves my daughter and your honour.


"WHAT DID I JUST SAY ABOUT PRIVACY. From now on, there will be no more locks in the house. Or keys. In fact, no more doors either."

What is between you? give me up the truth.

Laertes and Polonius both seem to be in the habit of speaking to Ophelia as though she were at any moment on the point of doing something evil and profligate. Ophelia has been in the grip of control freaks all her life.

OPHELIA
He hath, my lord, of late made many tenders
Of his affection to me.

LORD POLONIUS
Affection! pooh! you speak like a green girl,
Unsifted in such perilous circumstance.
Do you believe his tenders, as you call them?

OPHELIA
I do not know, my lord, what I should think.

LORD POLONIUS
Marry, I'll teach you: think yourself a baby;
That you have ta'en these tenders for true pay,
Which are not sterling. Tender yourself more dearly;
Or--not to crack the wind of the poor phrase,
Running it thus--you'll tender me a fool.


Ophelia's relationship with Laertes is a very different thing from her relationship with Polonius. When Laertes launched into his monologue about keys and treasure chests and other sexy things, Ophelia apparently went into a smile-and-nod mode of sisterly placation, a bit like she didn't take him seriously enough to argue with him. He's just her brother, after all, and he's about to fuck off to France. Polonius, on the other hand, has the ability to make her life a living hell. With Laertes, she answered questions with questions and never bothered to give him her opinion; here with Polonius, she tries to pretend she doesn't even have one. She betrays herself a second later, as though stirred up by the harsh tone Polonius takes with her. He mocks her fiercely with the repetition of "tenders", and she can't keep herself from responding, even though she submits in the end. Laertes was kinder---he spoke of the loss of Ophelia's own honor, while Polonius speaks only of the damage she may do to his. Laertes, whom she does not fear, is gone, and her only advisor now is Polonius, to whom she's not really a person.

OPHELIA
My lord, he hath importuned me with love
In honourable fashion.

LORD POLONIUS
Ay, fashion you may call it; go to, go to.

OPHELIA
And hath given countenance to his speech, my lord,
With almost all the holy vows of heaven.


I love the brief glimpse of her, bristling with indignation---although for a moment I see her as Polonius must, and wince, because she does sound dreadfully naive.

LORD POLONIUS
Ay, springes to catch woodcocks. I do know,
When the blood burns, how prodigal the soul
Lends the tongue vows: these blazes, daughter,
Giving more light than heat, extinct in both,
Even in their promise, as it is a-making,
You must not take for fire.


"Did I ever tell you about your Grandpappy Polonius, who hunted woodcocks with springes for nigh on thirty years? That's why everyone in the family uses that particular metaphor at least once in this play. It's a Polonius family tradition."

And again, although I hate to admit it, he's making sense. He knows what men are. But he's the type of person whose insight never exceeds the boundaries of his experience, so he's incapable of applying the same degree of understanding to his daughter.

For Lord Hamlet,
Believe so much in him, that he is young
And with a larger tether may he walk
Than may be given you: in few, Ophelia,
Do not believe his vows; for they are brokers,
Not of that dye which their investments show,
But mere implorators of unholy suits,
Breathing like sanctified and pious bawds,
The better to beguile. This is for all:
I would not, in plain terms, from this time forth,
Have you so slander any moment leisure,
As to give words or talk with the Lord Hamlet.
Look to't, I charge you: come your ways.


I like that he tries to give Hamlet credit for maybe thinking he's sincere, much as Laertes did. Or maybe he's just figured out that badmouthing Hamlet isn't the way to make Ophelia listen to him.

But oh, that awful, final interdiction. She's trapped, and she knows it.

OPHELIA
I shall obey, my lord.


What else can she do?



Tomorrow: Act I, Scene 4: A scene that would be hilarious if animated by the creators of Strong Bad.

Comments

( 26 comments — Leave a comment )
rj_anderson
Feb. 25th, 2008 02:30 am (UTC)
I knew I loved Ophelia right from that "ungracious pastors" speech. As you say, she's smarter than her thickity thick thick family give her credit for, and yet so mercilessly overruled by them. Agh! This whole section makes me want to spit nails.
cesario
Feb. 25th, 2008 06:24 am (UTC)
Poor lamb, she's smarter than anyone gives her credit for, in the play or out of it, seems like. One becomes very frustrated on her behalf.
angevin2
Feb. 25th, 2008 06:28 am (UTC)
Frances Barber wrote about playing Ophelia in Players of Shakespeare 2 and one of the things she said that stuck with me is that she felt like the best compliment she got on her performance was when someone told her he wished that her Hamlet had just told Ophelia what was up, because she'd probably have known what to do. I think that Ophelia totally should be like that.
cesario
Feb. 25th, 2008 06:52 am (UTC)
YES YES YES YES. HOLY CRAP. Ophelia was cautious and sensible and compassionate and could TOTALLY have helped. And it's not even really Hamlet's fault for not confiding in her, because...well, I think he probably would have liked to, that may well have been what he wanted to do when he ran in on her and freaked her out that time. ARGH.
angevin2
Feb. 25th, 2008 09:20 am (UTC)
Yeah. I've heard that speculated, too. But then, of course, she's boxed in by her father, anyway, and -- it's all such a big sad mess. If you can find Players 2, though, Barber's essay is well worth reading: she was determined to play Ophelia as not-a-dishrag, and her account of getting that across is really interesting. The other thing that stuck with me was the part where she says that the guy operating the trapdoor talked about catching all the great Ophelias over the years, and none of them had quite so many clothes on. ;)

(Also, irrelevantly, that icon is gorgeous!)
threeoranges
Feb. 25th, 2008 12:14 pm (UTC)
Why Hamlet Didn't Do That
"Ophelia, I've just seen the ghost of my dead Dad, and he says my stepfather killed him. So I've got to find a way to kill him for revenge. Can you help at all?"

"..."

"Oh, and you can keep what I just said a secret from your Dad, can't you?"

"..."

Much as I like the speech where she answers Laertes, she doesn't seem the sort who would support Hamlet in an act of murder. ("Infirm of purpose! Give me the daggers!") In any case, she's too close to her father to be a reliable confidante.

The best scenario would be her advising Hamlet not to do anything at all, as the vision's probably demonic. Worst scenario: she'd ask her father for his opinion on Hamlet's sanity, and Hamlet would end up in a room with nice quilted walls.

I can see why Hamlet wanted to keep her out of it, though I deplore as much as anyone his method of doing so.
cesario
Feb. 26th, 2008 12:25 am (UTC)
Re: Why Hamlet Didn't Do That
I don't believe anyone was suggesting Ophelia would spur Hamlet on to murder; he doesn't even tell Horatio he intends to kill Claudius. Possibly because he never actually comes up with a plan for doing it. The idea that captures my imagination is that if Hamlet had been able to talk to Ophelia about it early on she would have made a, I dunno, sensible suggestion, such as "tell your mother" or "take it to the people" or something else. The ultimate outcome might now have changed, but I'd have a higher opinion of Hamlet's wit.

But of course, Hamlet being able to talk to her presupposes that she had some sort of power base from which to resist her father's influence. Without the one, though, none of the other.
swordlily
Feb. 25th, 2008 03:44 am (UTC)
Poor Ophelia. I haven't encountered much discussion of her in my own Shakespeare classes, outside of the general consensus that she was so dominated by the male figures in her life, that after they were gone she fractured due to having nothing more to base her identity on. I had one professor in particular who habitually referred to her as the weakest woman in Shakespeare, which irritated me to no end.

once she goes mad everyone listens to her

Oh man. That line is so true it brought tears to my eyes.
cesario
Feb. 25th, 2008 06:29 am (UTC)
It is easy to overlook her significance, but I figure, Shakespeare's greatest creation was in love with her, she can't be a cypher.

And anyone who thinks she's weak isn't paying attention. When she goes mad, she becomes a virtual powerhouse. Doomed, but riveting as Rosalind in all her glory.
angevin2
Feb. 25th, 2008 06:26 am (UTC)
"I am using this key metaphor so that neither one of us will have to examine your 'chaste treasure' line too closely."

Yeah, because lock/key imagery is really useful when you want to avoid innuendo. ;)

This is an excellent post, though. I like the thing that you bring in with privacy, because surveillance is such a huge thing in the play. It's one of the things I love about Branagh's film that he really got that, what with all the secret passages and halls of mirrors and confessionals -- although that's sort of dodgy for me to say, as a Catholic, but it's a very early modern sensibility (doesn't Branagh put some of this scene in the chapel with its very visible confessional?), since early modern Protestants tended to freak out about the potential for surveillance it afforded. And of course Ophelia's body is a site of surveillance, like female bodies always are in patriarchal societies.

Which is also why your point about it not mattering (at least, socially; it would matter to the actors) whether or not Ophelia an Hamlet have actually had sex is a really good one: it's the visible, what things look like (and are thus interpretable) that is really important here. Of course, it also gives Ophelia a weirdly displaced body, but that makes a kind of sense as well, since her social status is pretty much that of "extension of her father."
cesario
Feb. 25th, 2008 07:01 am (UTC)
There are a lot of things that I love about Branagh's Hamlet, and the set is chief among them. It's claustrophobic and huge at the same time.

Ophelia...it would be easy for a bored critic to dismiss her as lacking agency, but I think it's fairly clear that she possess a degree of suppressed agency, which is not at all the same thing as not having it. The fact that she is at everyone's mercy makes it easy for readers to overlook her, but you notice that when she goes mad she baffles and frightens them as much as she does Gertrude and Claudius.
angevin2
Feb. 25th, 2008 09:28 am (UTC)
Absolutely, yes.

I think it's telling how she keeps saying "I pray you, mark" (or some variation thereof) during the mad scene. Like, "FOR ONCE, LISTEN TO ME" -- and they do. I forgot to mention before, I really liked your observation about how Ophelia's first line is an unanswered question, and I think that ties into it.

Anent Branagh's film, I think the image that sums up Kate Winslet's Ophelia is the part where she's being hosed down, and then after they turn the hose off she takes the key out of her mouth. Overlooked, suppressed agency -- that can only be expressed in a self-destructive manner.
lizbee
Feb. 25th, 2008 09:48 am (UTC)
It has just occurred to me that my relationship with my father is very much like Ophelia's with Polonius. Well, shit.

I'm very glad you're doing this, because it's helping me articulate why I love Ophelia so much. She's not stupid, she's just hampered by the stupidity of every. single. person. in. Denmark. (Her and Horatio -- Ophelia/Horatio shippers have a point, if those two got together, they could take over the world.) I mean, no wonder she goes mad, all that potential suppressed by everyone around her.
cesario
Feb. 25th, 2008 10:37 am (UTC)
I was actually just contemplating a Hamlet/Ophelia/Horatio scenario this evening...
lizbee
Feb. 25th, 2008 10:38 am (UTC)
This whole Shakespeare project is really just an elaborate excuse to write porn, isn't it?
cesario
Feb. 25th, 2008 10:47 am (UTC)
Hah, just wait till we get to Twelfth Night.
lizbee
Feb. 25th, 2008 10:53 am (UTC)
That's pretty much what I was already thinking.
tempestsarekind
Feb. 25th, 2008 05:19 pm (UTC)
I think there is actually a YA book where Horatio helps Ophelia, like, fake her death and run away, or something. I don't know if they get together, since I opened to one page in the bookstore and then collapsed into giggles, but there we are. I'm pretty sure it was called Ophelia, too, which should make it nice and easy to find if you're interested.

Anyway. *hugs you for loving Ophelia* It always amazes me that anyone can read her rejoinder to Laertes and think she's totally spineless, but they often do, alas. And this is fantastic: I used to wonder, just a bit, what drew Hamlet to her, and that may be it---a spark of something special in her that in time might have grown into something less fragile and more enduring.

My summer school students had real problems with this scene, for many reasons--but all of the girls in the class thought Laertes was horrible and nosy, and they would not be budged in the slightest from this opinion, even when I asked them to compare his and Polonius' speeches...and then one boy--who clearly had sisters--raised his hand kind of timidly and said, aggrieved, "He's just looking *out* for her!" Hee.
lizbee
Feb. 25th, 2008 07:49 pm (UTC)
Ophelia by Lisa Klein -- I liked it a lot, although I didn't care overmuch for the references to other Shakespearian plays. Loved the characters, though.
lareinenoire
Feb. 25th, 2008 06:24 pm (UTC)
More to the point, however, I don't think it MATTERS.

No, it completely does not matter. What matters is the possibility that she might have slept with Hamlet, which condemns her straight out. This happens in Much Ado, and with even direr consequences in Othello.

And I completely agree with the fact that people start listening to Ophelia when she goes mad. Because all of a sudden, she's scaring the living hell out of them at least in part because I think they realise she's telling the truth and has no compunction about it. I do remember loving Kate Winslet's performance in the Branagh Hamlet for how forceful she was.
cesario
Feb. 26th, 2008 12:27 am (UTC)
Kate Winslet's Ophelia is brilliant, yes. Never saw a better. Not that I've seen a bunch, but, you know.
y_fish
Feb. 26th, 2008 01:14 am (UTC)
ZOMG THE VIOLETS! I am so glad that somebody else is interested in their significance to Ophelia's character! I (like just about every other high school English student, ever) wrote an essay about Hamlet in twelfth grade, specifically about the female characters of it and Macbeth. A footnote in my copy of Hamlet said that the violet was a symbol of faithfulness in Shakespeare's time, and so much possible symbolism fell into place when I read that.

Laertes could be referring to Hamlet as a violet to emphasise that his faithfulness is only as lasting as the little weed that freezes under the first snow, warning Ophelia of a man's passion's tendency to cool once quenched. And then Ophelia's line later, "I would have given you violets, but they withered all when my father died--" WOW. Okay, so as I saw it, Ophelia's greatest conflict is whether to be faithful to the desires of her family, who wish her to be chaste and safe, or to be faithful to Hamlet, who doesn't quite wish the same thing. Ophelia does love her father and brother, however opressive they may be, and she does love Hamlet, despite his emo-crazy-suicidal bits. It really hurts her to know that whatever action she chooses, she has to break the trust of some man that she loves-- Ophelia is stressed almost to the point of crazy even before her father goes and gets hisself kill't. But when he does... the shit goes down.

Ophelia doesn't have to be faithful to a dead father anymore. Or maybe she still does? As you so perfectly pointed out, surveillance and lack of privacy was a big part of Ophelia's life. Now that Daddy's dead, is he unable to know all the naughty things that Ophelia may or may not be doing, or does his spirit now see even the deepest secrets of Ophelia's heart? Does Ophelia feel responsible for her father's death? Is she thinking, "Man, if only I had obeyed him and not gone near Hamlet, maybe Hamlet wouldn't have gone crazy?" Or is she thinking "My love might have kept Hamlet from killing my dad! Goddamnit, Dad, he wouldn't have been behind that curtain if he'd been sleeping with me at the time! But I can't hate you because you're DEAD! AAAUGH!"

And if that wasn't enough to drive her crazy, it was HER BOYFRIEND who killed her Daddy. Sure, she might be free to roll in the hay with Hamlet now, but she sure as hell doesn't want to! Her beloved man did something unspeakable and unexplainable and horrible and she has no idea what to think of it. What little faith in Hamlet's goodness she might have had left (which was not much after that "Get thee to a nunnery!" conversation) is so gone now. All Ophelia's faithful violets have withered. She has no faith nor duty to anyone anymore. So Ophelia thinks, "You know what? Fuck life. The bottom of the pond is a better option."

Thank you for listening to this test of the Emergency English Paper Broadcasting System. Had this been a real English paper, it would have been 13 pages long, double-spaced, and distinctly lacking in profanity. We now return you to your regularly scheduled programming.
cesario
Mar. 4th, 2008 09:11 am (UTC)
You know, I also wrote about Hamlet and Macbeth in 12th grade. I think we had a choice between comparing and contrasting Ophelia with Lady Macbeth, or Hamlet with Macbeth, and I picked the chicks. In retrospect, you know, that was an incredibly uninspired sort of essay topic. OH HEY WAIT A MINUTE, I just remembered: you went to Enloe too. HAHAHAHAH. Boy, do they ever need to get a new freakin' curriculum.

Apparently, according to my book on floral symbolism, violets are meant to stand for modesty. WHY that should be so I am sure I don't know since violets are the gaudiest little flowers you ever saw. But I, like you, would be much more inclined to connect them to Hamlet and his passion than to Ophelia's maiden modesty.
infiniteviking
Feb. 26th, 2008 05:11 am (UTC)
Now I know why Ophelia annoyed me so much. Because she shouldn't have let that happen to her, darnit.

..yeah, it was the way things happened in those days, she had no choice, etc. But all the intelligence and spirit you point out just highlights how she deserved so much better than being torn to bits by incompatible conditions.
cesario
Mar. 4th, 2008 09:14 am (UTC)
She makes much more sense to me, in terms of "letting things happen to her", if you think of her as being about 15, 'cause when you're that age you can never conceive of the world ever being different from how it is right now.

I love your icon, btw. It keeps reminding me that I need to see that movie again. And read it again, no doubt.
infiniteviking
Mar. 13th, 2008 05:38 am (UTC)
Hm, that's true. Makes it all the more tragic, then; she'd have made a formidable woman if her mind had had a chance to develop.

*smiles* Thanks! Feel free to grab it, if you like. I still haven't seen any of the movies, but dearly want to.
( 26 comments — Leave a comment )